In-Congress Workshop 5 - Representation in CBT: A Framework for Clinical and Systemic Practice
Thursday, June 25, 2026
2:00 PM - 5:00 PM PDT
Location: Yerba Buena Salon 3, B3 Level
Earn 3 Credit
Keywords: Multicultural Psychology, Training / Training Directors, Culturally Responsible Programming Recommended Readings: British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP). BAME Positive Practice Guide (PPG): Representation, Workforce Experience, and Service Delivery. BABCP, UK., Curtis, E., Jones, R., Tipene-Leach, D., Walker, C., Loring, B., Paine, S. J., & Reid, P. (2019). Why cultural safety rather than cultural competency is required to achieve health equity: a literature review and recommended definition. International journal for equity in health, 18(1), 174., Lawton, L., McRae, M., & Gordon, L. (2021). Frontline yet at the back of the queue – improving access and adaptations to CBT for Black African and Caribbean communities. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 14, e30., ,
CBT Therapist NHS and Private Practice London, England, United Kingdom
Representation within CBT is often reduced to a statistical exercise, focused on numerical diversity within teams or services. While commonly measured in this way, such approaches fail to capture how representation is experienced, enacted, and sustained within clinical and organisational systems.
In contexts where formal diversity or inclusion initiatives may be limited or contested, the Representation Model offers a framework for understanding how structural dynamics—such as leadership pathways, supervision practices, recruitment processes, and allocation of clinical labour—continue to shape engagement, psychological safety, and outcomes within CBT systems.
This workshop introduces the Representation Model and demonstrates its application across CBT practice, education, supervision, recruitment, and leadership. The model maps common failure points in representation, including absence, tokenism, and performative inclusion, and examines their impact on trust, engagement, power, and safety. Participants will explore how representation may stagnate at entry levels (“sticky floors”), remain absent from senior leadership (“glass ceilings”), or become symbolic rather than structural. The workshop will also address how misapplied notions of representation can result in the unequal distribution of clinical and emotional labour, such as routing clients from particular identity groups to a single clinician without adequate consideration of client choice, therapist consent, or professional impact.
Drawing on clinical, organisational, and educational examples, the workshop will examine how limited or performative representation contributes to disengagement, burnout, and experiences of marginalisation, including racial trauma. An intersectional lens will demonstrate how the model can be applied across protected characteristics without reducing representation to identity matching. Through applied mapping and structured reflection, participants will examine representation within their own contexts and identify what authentic representation looks like in day-to-day CBT practice, including recruitment decisions, leadership pathways, supervision cultures, curriculum design, and policy implementation.
Learning Objectives:
Identify how representation operates beyond numbers, including its impact on psychological safety within CBT systems.
Use the Representation Model to map where representation breaks down within services, training, supervision, and leadership structures.
Apply the Representation Model to inform ethical recruitment, supervision, education, and leadership decisions in CBT contexts.